Preliminary analyses

Getting quick-term mate poaching, forty eight guys (forty five.7% of men) and you will 50 people (38.5% of women) indicated about some knowledge of lover poaching (we.elizabeth., obtained > 0). For long-term mate poaching, twenty four males (twenty-two.8% of men) and you will forty two females (33.8% of women) expressed at the least some expertise in partner poaching (i.elizabeth., obtained > 0). 2%) and you will 44 lady (33.8%) conveyed at the least particular experience in companion poaching (we.age., scored > 0).

Someone didn’t disagree within their reports off lover poaching efforts or their success within partner poaching (short-name poaching shot: t (233) = 0.91, p = .366; long-identity poaching decide to try: t (233) = -step one.385, p = .167; private relationships poaching shot: t (233) = https://datingranking.net/religious-dating/.022, p = .983; short-term poaching victory: t (96) = -step 1.50, p = .137, long-identity poaching profits t (66) = 0.fifty, p = .618; new dating poaching profits: t (80) = -0.545, p = .587.

Primary analyses

I first computed the correlations certainly personality variables, partner poaching efforts, and you can partner poaching success for every intercourse. Once again, i remember that this new test brands to own spouse poaching achievements parameters was in fact small and be careful within interpretation of these overall performance. Answers are described during the Desk 3. (suite…)